**Please format to APA 6th Ed., and include three references. This is an American University, so keep that in mind when looking at EEO laws. I am attaching a grading guide, to make sure all the points are hit. Please follow it closely. THANK YOU!!**During a global career succession assessment of leadership talent pipeline, a candidate was asked to complete a personality/behavioral tendency profile. The candidate asked to speak to the program administrator about the validity of the assessment. The assessment is based on first responses to several sets of word values. The instructions were to respond with first instinct to the set of words listed in several different categories. The candidate stated that some of the words could have different interpretations based on values, beliefs, and cultural origin. Therefore, the validity of the assessment could be biased in terms of results/outcomes. The program administrator removed the weighting of the assessment (not part of the overall assessment scoring) to be used for informational and team building purposes only. Use the above information to answer the following in 700 to 1,050 words:Analyze whether the candidate has a valid discrimination concern about the assessment.Determine what EEOC laws could potentially be at risk of violation.Evaluate how the assessment could be altered so that it could still be used for the program. Cite all sources according to APA formatting guidelines.
hrm326_r5_employee_assessment_case_study_grading_guide_week2.doc

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Employee Assessment Grading Guide
HRM/326 Version 5
Employee Assessment Grading Guide
HRM/326 Version 5
Employee Development
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All
other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended
to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
1
Employee Assessment Grading Guide
HRM/326 Version 5
Individual Assignment: Employee Assessment Case Study
Purpose of Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is to review a case study concerning the legalities of employee assessments
for succession planning purposes. The student will review the case and then determine what EEOC areas
could pose a potential legal concern with the outcome of the assessment.
Grading Guide
Content
70 Percent
Met
Partially
Met
Not Met
Total
Available
Total
Earned
7
#/7
Partially
Met
Not Met
Total
Available
Total
Earned
3
#/3
Comments:
The student analyzes whether the candidate
has a valid discrimination concern about the
assessment.
The student determines what EEOC laws
could potentially be at risk of violation.
The student evaluates how the assessment
could be altered so that it could still be used
for the program.
The paper is between 700 and 1,050 words.
Writing Guidelines
30 Percent
Met
The paper—including tables and graphs,
headings, title page, and reference page—is
consistent with APA formatting guidelines and
meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text
citations and a reference page.
Paragraph and sentence transitions are
present, logical, and maintain the flow
throughout the paper.
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Rules of grammar and usage are followed
including spelling and punctuation.
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Comments:
2
Employee Assessment Grading Guide
HRM/326 Version 5
Assignment Total
#
10
#/10
Additional comments:
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
3

Our essay writing service fulfills every request with the highest level of urgency.
attachment