*Review the assigned article, “Leadership Lessons From the Chilean Mine Rescue.” *Write a 500-750 words paper that analyzes the Chilean mine rescue. As a leader, you will be faced with responding immediately to solve issues. The Chilean mine rescue is an example of leadership under extreme circumstances. Reflect on this example to shape how you might apply the goal-path theory and the situational approach in an everyday, real-world situation. **Address the following questions and concepts: How did the leaders demonstrate flexibility and adaptability? Please provide examples.How did the leaders apply aspects of the path-goal theory to this situation? Provide examples.Did the leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved? How could communication have been improved?How well did the leaders follow the situational approach to leadership? Provide examples.How does this example shape how you might apply the goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real-world situation, in your content? **Include three to five references to support your position. ***Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. ****This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. ****You will be graded on (Rubric): 1. Explanation of How the Case Study Demonstrates Flexibility and Adaptability: Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 2. Explanation of How the Leaders in the Case Study Apply Aspects of the Path-Goal Theory: Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 3. Explanation of How Leaders Communicate Effectively With All of the Stakeholders Involved and How Communication Could Be Improved: Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 4. Explanation of How Well the Leaders Followed the Situational Approach to Leadership: Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 5. Explanation of How the Case Study Shapes How To Apply Goal-Path Theory and The Situational Approach In A Real World Situation: Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding. 6. Thesis Development and Purpose: Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 7. Argument Logic and Construction: Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 8. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style): Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.